Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Measuring the efficiency of a solids-based wastewater extraction using BCoV and validation of a BCoV and PMMoV RT-qPCR duplex assay.

Created on 07 Aug 2026

Authors

Codey E Dueck, Nataliya Santiago, Nikho A Hizon, Ravinder Lidder, Dave Spreitzer, Umar P Mohammed, MacKenzie Dyck, Chand S Mangat, Edgard M Mejia

Published in

MethodsX. Volume 17. Pages 104059. Epub Jul 23, 2026.

Abstract

Bovine coronavirus (BCoV) is commonly used to evaluate the efficiency of nucleic acid extraction protocols used in wastewater-based surveillance (WBS). Here we outline a method for measuring the efficiency of a solids-based extraction protocol using RT-qPCR detections of BCoV spiked into wastewater samples. Validation steps included: determination of a suitable quantification method for BCoV starting material, measures of endogenous BCoV in wastewater, assessment of the effects of BCoV incubation times on wastewater extraction efficiencies, and implementation of a BCoV and Pepper Mild Mottle Virus (PMMoV) RT-qPCR duplex assay. Results show that an accurate baseline measure of BCoV stock concentrations is best achieved using heat lysis extraction compared to an automated method. We also show that endogenous BCoV can be present in wastewater, albeit at low viral loads. Additionally, a BCoV incubation time of 16 h in wastewater resulted in the highest percent recovery. Lastly, the use of the BCoV and PMMoV RT-qPCR duplex assay demonstrates comparable performance to their singleplex counterparts. • A method for measuring the extraction efficiency of a solids-based wastewater extraction process using BCoV. • Insights into the in situ prevalence of BCoV in wastewater samples. • Assessment of a multiplex assay for simultaneous detection of BCoV and PMMoV.

PMID:
42564716
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement