Family planning services financing in the West African Economic and Monetary Union countries: Trend analysis from 2013 to 2021.

Authors

Danielle Yugbaré Belemsaga, Simon T Nassa, Yann Tapsoba, Kadari Cissé, Désiré L Dahourou, Henri G Ouedraogo, Seni Kouanda

Published in

Journal of public health in Africa. Volume 17. Issue 1. Pages 1690. Epub Jul 14, 2026.

Abstract

Access to high-quality family planning (FP) services is crucial for addressing unintended pregnancies and maternal mortality. There is uncertainty about health expenditures, especially FP services, by financing sources.
The study aims to conduct key analyses on health and reproductive health expenditures in the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU).
This analysis was performed across the eight WAEMU countries (Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal and Togo) from 2013 to 2021.
We conducted a secondary data analysis using the Global Health Expenditures Database. The variables were the current health expenditures, reproductive health expenditures, and FP expenditures by funding source (National General Government, External Funding Sources, and National Private Sector). We performed a trend and funding-source analysis in purchasing power parity in United States dollars.
Current expenditures allocated to health, reproductive, and FP services increased in recent years, growing by 4.6%, 5.9%, and 2.7% per year, respectively, in the region. The evidence is strong that countries have commitments to improving health and strengthening access to reproductive health services, especially modern contraceptives. However, FP funding is still dependent on external resources. In most countries, including Benin, Burkina Faso, Guinea- Bissau, Mali, and Senegal, more than half of FP expenditures are funded by external resources, whereas Côte d'Ivoire and Niger rely heavily on government resources. In Togo, the main FP funding sources are the domestic private resources.
The significant dependence of Public Finance management systems on external funding, with the government's low contribution, may undermine the sustainability of FP programmes in these countries.
The evidence suggests increasing domestic resource mobilisation for FP through integrated co-financing mechanisms and advocacy for FP reprioritisation within governments' health budgets, and ensuring efficient and equitable allocation of existing resources through resource reprogramming based on the country background, national priorities, and high-impact interventions.

PMID:
42564544
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.