Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Matching cues to attention: how visual and social cues differentially benefit students with low sustained or selective attention.

Created on 07 Aug 2026

Authors

Yao Li, Xuejiao Du

Published in

Frontiers in psychology. Volume 17. Pages 1848365. Epub Jul 23, 2026.

Abstract

In the digital era, fragmented information impairs the sustained and selective attention of some students, making it difficult for them to remain engaged in instructional videos. Adding cues to instructional videos is a direct method for attracting and sustaining attention. Cues can be classified as visual or social. However, the differential effects of visual and social cues on the learning outcomes of students with varying levels of sustained or selective attention remain unclear. To address this, two experiments were conducted with university students as participants.
In both experiments, students watched instructional videos with different cues and completed test materials. Experiment 1 adopted a 2 (sustained attention level: high, low) × 2 (cue type: visual, social) between-participants design, with a final sample of 105 participants. Experiment 2 adopted a 2 (selective attention level: high, low) × 2 (cue type: visual, social) between-participants design, with a final sample of 104 participants.
The results of Experiment 1 showed that in the transfer test only, students with low sustained attention performed better with social than with visual cues. The results of Experiment 2 showed that in the retention test alone, students with low selective attention performed better with visual than with social cues.
For students with low sustained attention, incorporating social cues into instructional videos may be a better choice than visual cues for promoting knowledge transfer. For students with low selective attention, incorporating visual cues may be prioritized over social cues for enhancing knowledge retention.

PMID:
42564693
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement