Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Causal association between cataract and psychiatric disorders: A bidirectional 2-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Created on 08 Aug 2026

Authors

Xiaoling Su, Guoqiang Tian

Published in

Medicine. Volume 105. Issue 32. Pages e50075. Aug 07, 2026.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the genetic causality between cataract (senile and other types) and psychiatric disorders using Mendelian randomization (MR). We performed a bidirectional 2-sample MR analysis using genome-wide association studies summary data. Primary analysis employed inverse-variance weighted, MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode methods. Sensitivity analyses included Cochran Q, MR-pleiotropy residual sum and outlier, MR-Egger intercept, and leave-one-out tests to assess heterogeneity and pleiotropy. Forward MR analysis revealed a suggestive causal effect of other cataract on anxiety (inverse-variance weighted odds ratio [OR] = 0.99, 95% confidence interval: 0.98-1.00, P = .043), though unsupported by other methods. MR-Egger and weighted median suggested potential associations between other cataract and bipolar disorder (P < .05). No significant links were found between senile cataract and psychiatric disorders. Reverse MR analysis showed no consistent causal effects, except for anxiety disorder on other cataract (MR-Egger OR = 8.04, P = .040; weighted median OR = 2.99, P = .047). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness despite heterogeneity. This study provides evidence of a potential causal relationship between other cataract and anxiety, though findings were method-dependent. No significant associations were observed for senile cataract or most psychiatric disorders.

PMID:
42566603
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement