Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Effectiveness of a Brief Internet-Based Workplace Training Program to Support Help Seeking for Mental Ill-Health: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Created on 08 Aug 2026

Authors

Philip J Batterham, Amelia Gulliver, Cassandra Heffernan, Alison L Calear, Aliza Werner-Seidler, Alyna Turner, Louise M Farrer, Mary Lou Chatterton, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Monica Gendi, Michael Berk

Published in

Journal of medical Internet research. Volume 28. Pages e89215. Aug 07, 2026. Epub Aug 07, 2026.

Abstract

Depression and anxiety are prevalent in working-aged adults. Although treatment provided by health professionals can improve symptoms and functioning, many people experiencing mental ill-health do not seek help. There have been very few effective interventions to improve help seeking in adults, with none implemented across diverse workplaces through online delivery.
The primary aim of this trial was to test the effectiveness of a co-designed program for increasing professional help seeking intentions in Australian employees, relative to an active control condition.
A triple-blinded, 2-arm cluster randomized controlled trial (N=487; control workplaces: n=26 and intervention workplaces: n=25) was conducted to assess the relative effectiveness of Helipad, a fully automated co-designed single-session interactive program (intervention condition) with a standard psychoeducation program (active control condition). Eligible workplaces (those with ≥50 employees and an employee assistance program; clusters) were recruited via advertising or invited directly by researchers. Eligible participants (employees in a participating Australian workplace, aged ≥18 y, living in Australia, fluent in reading and understanding English, and had access to a device and a reliable internet connection) completed a pretest, immediate posttest, and 6-month follow-up survey sent via email assessing help seeking intentions (primary outcome); mental illness stigma; mental health literacy; help seeking attitudes and behavior; work and activity functioning; quality of life; and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and general psychological distress.
A significant difference in change over time in professional help seeking intentions was found between the 2 conditions (F2,185.44=6.89; P=.001), with planned contrasts showing that the Helipad program was effective in increasing professional help seeking intentions compared with the control at the primary end point of immediate posttest (t359.35=-3.72; P<.001). This difference was not maintained at the 6-month follow-up (t119.76=-1.05; P=.30). Retention rates were 71.1% at posttest and 24.9% at follow-up. The Helipad program was also associated with improved mental health literacy and help seeking attitudes at posttest. Helipad was not significantly superior to the control in reducing mental illness stigma or improving professional help seeking behavior; functioning; quality of life; or symptoms of depression, anxiety, or general psychological distress (secondary outcomes) at the 6-month follow-up. A total of 15 people (control: n=9, 4.5%; intervention: n=6, 4.3%) reported adverse events at posttest.
This study demonstrated that the co-designed online Helipad program was effective in improving the intentions of employees to seek help from a professional compared to an active control. The program also improved mental health literacy and help seeking attitudes, but these changes were not sustained and did not translate into observable differences in help seeking behaviors or mental health symptoms. This was the first trial of a co-designed intervention to improve mental health help seeking in general workplaces, with previous trials focusing primarily on specific high-risk work environments. Workplace programs that can be delivered at scale may lead to more appropriate engagement with professional mental health care to prevent poor mental health outcomes and increase productivity.

PMID:
42566718
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement