Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Enhancing Self-Reflection and Assessment in Dental Education: A Comparative Study on e-Portfolio Use in Preclinical and Clinical Training.

Created on 08 Aug 2026

Authors

Juan Ignacio Aura-Tormos, Esther García-Miralles, Laura Marqués-Martínez

Published in

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe. Aug 07, 2026. Epub Aug 07, 2026.

Abstract

E-portfolios support reflective learning, competency development and personalised assessment. This study compared dental students' perceptions of e-portfolio use between preclinical fourth-year and clinical fifth-year training, focusing on benefits, challenges and assessment preferences.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted among students enrolled in Paediatric Dentistry and Paediatric Practicum over two academic years. A 25-item questionnaire, developed from previous instruments and refined through expert review by four faculty members, covered six thematic areas. Sample size was estimated using Cochran's formula. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests with Cramér's V, Benjamini-Hochberg correction, and thematic analysis were used.
Of 208 invited students, 176 completed the survey, and 165 valid responses were analysed (84 preclinical, 81 clinical). Both groups valued e-portfolios for self-reflection. After correction, technical difficulties were more frequent among preclinical students (pBH = 0.012, V = 0.25). Clinical students perceived e-portfolios as fairer than traditional assessment (pBH = 0.039, V = 0.23), preferred written feedback (pBH = 0.012, V = 0.28), and revised portfolio content more frequently (pBH = 0.020, V = 0.25). Other small effects did not survive correction.
E-portfolios were positively perceived at both stages, shifting from skill-showcasing to competency documentation. These findings support scaffolded integration in competency-based dental education.

PMID:
42566715
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement