Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Mannose supports lung cancer metabolism during glycolytic limitation.

Created on 08 Aug 2026

Authors

Theresa Haitzmann, Niklas B Thompson, Hardik Shah, Katharina Schindlmaier, Joseph Jelwan, Thomas O Eichmann, Nia G Hammond, Maia G Clare, Robert B Cameron, Brandon Faubert, Katharina Leithner

Published in

EMBO reports. Aug 07, 2026. Epub Aug 07, 2026.

Abstract

Cancer cells frequently show elevated glucose consumption to support proliferation and survival. This led to the assumption that glycolytic inhibitors could be effective in cancer treatment. However, barriers to clinical implementation remain. Adaptive strategies, such as metabolizing alternative nutrients, may play a role. Here, we investigated the use of an understudied sugar, mannose, in lung cancer cells and xenografts. Stable isotope tracing reveals enhanced contribution of mannose to GDP-mannose and GDP-fucose, key glycosylation precursors, upon treatment with the glycolytic inhibitor 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) or glucose starvation in vitro. Mannose restores the glucose-withdrawal-induced decrease of GDP-mannose and GDP-fucose pools, and partially rescues proliferation upon 2-DG treatment or glucose deprivation. 13C6-mannose infusion in patient-derived xenograft mice reveals a considerable contribution of mannose to GDP-mannose and GDP-fucose in tumors, which is further enhanced by 2-DG. In normal lungs, the pathway is only partially active. Mannose is also shuttled towards glycolysis in lung tumors in vivo and glucose-deprived cells in vitro. In conclusion, mannose utilization for glycosylation precursor synthesis represents an adaptive strategy in lung cancer cells under metabolic stress.

PMID:
42567946
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement