Prediction of Clinically Meaningful Improvement After Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Anxiety Disorders: Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model Development and Temporal Validation Study.

Authors

Olly Kravchenko, Matthew Halvorsen, Julia Bäckman, Viktor Kaldo, James J Crowley, Ralf Kuja-Halkola, Christian Rück, John Wallert

Published in

Journal of medical Internet research. Volume 28. Pages e100162. Aug 07, 2026. Epub Aug 07, 2026.

Abstract

Up to 50% of patients treated with internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) for depression and anxiety disorders do not experience clinically significant symptom reduction. Identifying these patients prior to the initiation of ICBT can support treatment planning.
The aim of this study was to enhance baseline prediction of clinically meaningful improvement in patients treated with ICBT for common psychiatric disorders in routine care, which could ultimately inform treatment planning at intake.
We developed multimodal predictive models integrating clinical, sociodemographic, and genetic data available pretreatment to predict clinically meaningful improvement in a sample of 1790 patients treated with ICBT for major depressive disorder, panic disorder, and social anxiety disorder. We applied machine learning algorithms of varying complexity (logistic regression, random forest [RF], extreme gradient boosting, support vector machines, soft voting, and stacking ensemble), with nested cross-validation, elastic net variable selection, multiple imputation, and temporal validation in a 20% holdout test set (n=356). The primary performance measure was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
All full phenotypic models showed comparable performance (AUCtest 0.732-0.749), with RF achieving the best holdout discrimination (AUCtest 0.749, 95% CI 0.698-0.797). Compared with the benchmark model based on self-reported screening data (AUCtest 0.695, 95% CI 0.637-0.748), RF and both ensemble models incorporating register data showed higher discrimination in paired DeLong tests (P=.04, P=.02, and P=.03, respectively), whereas polygenic scores added no independent predictive value in this cohort and modeling setup (P=.97).
These promising results support the feasibility of baseline prognostic prediction of clinically meaningful improvement after ICBT and provide a basis for the prospective validation of model-informed risk stratification.

PMID:
42567682
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.