Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Can agentic AI dent Eroom's Law? Large reasoning models across the drug discovery and development pipeline.

Created on 08 Aug 2026

Authors

Sheraz Khan, John G Samuelsson, Xuemei Cai, Kannan Natarajan, Subha Madhavan

Published in

Drug discovery today. Pages 104754. Aug 04, 2026. Epub Aug 04, 2026.

Abstract

Productivity in pharmaceutical R&D continues to fall despite deeper biological insight and steady gains in clinical development operations - a phenomenon termed Eroom's Law. Agentic AI workflows powered by reasoning-trained large language models (LLMs), increasingly described as large reasoning models (LRMs), could potentially dent this trend. Unlike earlier task-specific models, these systems couple multi-step reasoning with the ability to plan, invoke external tools and retrieve authoritative information, enabling them to decompose and execute complex scientific and operational tasks. This review discusses agentic AI applications across the drug development continuum, from target discovery to post-market surveillance, and highlights three near-term use cases: algorithmic drug repurposing, informed consent support and automated drafting of regulatory documents. For each, we outline plausible architectures, the current level of supporting evidence and the principal failure modes that constrain deployment. Realizing these gains, however, requires prospective validation, rigorous human oversight and governance frameworks that align algorithmic outputs with clinical, ethical, legal and regulatory standards. When implemented responsibly, agentic AI could transform human-AI collaboration in biopharma, improving R&D efficiency and accelerating delivery of safer, more-effective therapies.

PMID:
42551551
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement