A Chemotherapy Progression Decision Score for Treatment Selection After Initial Assessment in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors

Yixin Zhang, Zhongquan Sun, Hongfan Ding, Changlin Zou, Linping Dong, Qi Xu, Jiali Ji, Xin Han, Hanqi Yu, Daqian Xu, Gaopeng Li, Yuhao Wang, Haoliang He, Yufeng Zhong, Xiaochang Wu, Jieer Ying, Weilin Wang, Yuan Ding

Published in

MedComm. Volume 7. Issue 8. Pages e70903. Epub Aug 06, 2026.

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies, with chemotherapy response evaluation currently relying on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). However, RECIST inadequately captures the unique biology of PDAC, particularly stromal fibrosis-induced radiographic pseudoprogression. We developed and externally validated a multivariable prognostic prediction model, the chemotherapy Progression Decision (cPD) score, integrating biological markers and imaging metrics to guide therapeutic decision-making after the first RECIST assessment. This multicenter retrospective study enrolled 616 PDAC patients across three cohorts: the Training Cohort (n = 155), Validation Cohort 1 (n = 263), and Validation Cohort 2 (n = 198). Multivariable Cox regression identified four independent prognostic predictors: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, baseline carbohydrate antigen 19-9, tumor maximum cross-sectional rate change ratio, and emergence of new lesions. These were integrated into an integer-based score (8-13 points) stratifying patients into good prognosis (GP), poor prognosis (PP), and critical prognosis (CP) groups. The cPD model demonstrated robust discrimination and calibration, with significant survival differences across groups in all cohorts. Notably, the cPD score identified a subset of patients (GP and PP groups) for whom continuing the original chemotherapy yielded significantly better survival than switching regimens, even when RECIST classified the disease as progressive.

PMID:
42568817
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.