Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Gender Differences in the Association Between Marriage and Cognitive Decline: Evidence From the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).

Created on 08 Aug 2026

Authors

Yanfei Zhang, Jin Wang, Tianqiang Zhang, Guorui Liu

Published in

PsyCh journal. Volume 15. Issue 4. Pages e70119.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between marital status and the risk of cognitive decline in middle-aged and older adults, with a particular focus on gender differences. Data were derived from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), using Cox proportional hazards models to examine the association between marital status and cognitive decline. The analysis controlled for sociodemographic factors (age, education, smoking, alcohol consumption), lifestyle factors (physical activity, sleep), and gender. Gender-stratified analyses were conducted to explore potential differences in the protective effects of marriage on cognitive function. The overall association between marital status and cognitive decline risk did not reach statistical significance after controlling for confounders. However, gender-stratified analysis revealed that marriage was significantly negatively associated with cognitive decline risk in men. No significant association was observed in women. Age remained a significant predictor of cognitive impairment. Marriage may be associated with cognitive function, particularly among men, while no significant association was observed in women. These findings suggest that gender differences should be taken into account in cognitive health interventions. Future studies are warranted to explore the potential mediating roles of marital quality, social support, and emotional interactions in shaping cognitive outcomes.

PMID:
42568296
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement