Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Development of United-Atom Force Fields for Monomeric and Oligomeric Ionic Liquids through Regression-Guided Optimization of Electronic Continuum Correction Parameters.

Created on 08 Aug 2026

Authors

Md Fahim Newaz, Takahiko Ikarashi, Takeshi Fukuma, Takashi Sumikama

Published in

ACS omega. Volume 11. Issue 30. Pages 45465-45476. Aug 04, 2026. Epub Jul 21, 2026.

Abstract

Ionic liquids are salts that exist in the liquid state at room temperature and exhibit high viscosity because of their strong electrostatic interactions. It was difficult to reproduce their viscosity by molecular dynamics simulations with conventional nonpolarizable force fields; however, recent development of force fields implementing electronic continuum correction (ECC), which accounts for polarizability, has enabled accurate predictions. Here, we present a regression-guided strategy to optimize scaling factors for ECC charges and Lennard-Jones parameters for monomeric (BMIM+, MOEMIM+) and oligomeric (IL22+, IL44+) imidazolium-based cations paired with TFSI- with united-atom models. The scaling factors were optimized to simultaneously reproduce experimental density and viscosity. To validate the strategy, we calculated the temperature dependence of density, diffusion coefficient, conductivity, and viscosity of BMIM-TFSI, achieving good agreements with experiments. Moreover, scaling factors optimized for MOEMIM+, which shares similar chemical structure and elemental compositions with IL22+ and IL44+, were found to be transferable to these compounds. Thus, this work not only provides a practical regression-guided workflow for selecting ECC-based united-atom force-field parameters but also suggests their transferability across chemically related ionic liquids.

PMID:
42569127
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement