Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Study of Microscopic Flow Mechanisms of Water Huff-n-Puff Considering Salinity Effects.

Created on 08 Aug 2026

Authors

Xiong Liu, Yueqi Cui, Yuchan Cheng, Tuanqi Yao, Yue Gong, Zhiyuan Du

Published in

ACS omega. Volume 11. Issue 30. Pages 44872-44886. Aug 04, 2026. Epub Jul 22, 2026.

Abstract

To address the issues of declining performance over multiple cycles of water huff-n-puff and the unclear microscopic oil-water dynamic behaviors, this study employs microfluidic technology and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) chips to simulate reservoir structures. We systematically investigate the effects of key parametersincluding the number of huff-n-puff cycles, injection rate, soaking period, reservoir geometry, and injection water typeon development performance. The experiments compare oil recovery efficiency in high- and low-permeability zones, analyze the characteristics of oil mobilization in individual cycles and throughout the entire process, and identify the dominant controlling factors. The results show that under a salinity of 5000 mg/L, oil recovery increases with more huff-n-puff cycles, but the rate of improvement slows. Higher injection rates and shorter soaking times lead to reduced recovery. Capillary forces play a less significant role in large-pore and wide-fracture structures. Injection water with high salinity (100,000 mg/L, including NaCl and CaCl2) suppresses oil recovery due to ion-crude oil interactions. In the absence of clay minerals, reservoir geometry and injection water type exhibit a stronger influence on oil recovery. This work provides a basis for optimizing water huff-n-puff operational parameters and elucidating the underlying microscopic mechanisms.

PMID:
42569057
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement