Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

How Biologics Are Changing the Global Burden of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review.

Created on 09 Aug 2026

Authors

Yousef Abu Osba, Sanad Elshebli, Abdullah Abureesh, Araek Al-Shraideh, Yousef Yousef, Mohammad Abu-Shaban, Omar Abureesh

Published in

Cureus. Volume 18. Issue 7. Pages e112332. Epub Jul 09, 2026.

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, has evolved from a condition concentrated in high-income Western nations into a global disease. The therapeutic landscape has been transformed by biologic agents, including anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) antibodies, anti-integrin therapy (vedolizumab), interleukin (IL)-12/23 blockade (ustekinumab), and selective IL-23 (p19) inhibitors (risankizumab and mirikizumab); more recently, oral small-molecule advanced therapies (Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators) have broadened the treatment armamentarium further. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary epidemiological data such as incidence, prevalence, mortality, disability, healthcare utilization, and economic burden, and landmark randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine how biologic therapy is reshaping the global burden of IBD. We summarize the mechanisms and pivotal efficacy evidence for each major class, and we appraise their measurable impact on hard outcomes, mucosal healing, surgery, hospitalization, disability, and quality of life, alongside the comparative-effectiveness data emerging from head-to-head trials. We then consider an apparent paradox: although biologics reduce complications in trial settings, population-level reductions in surgery and hospitalization have been inconsistent, and the cost of IBD care has shifted toward pharmaceuticals and risen overall. Finally, we address the role of biosimilars in improving affordability and the persistent access divide between high-income and resource-limited settings. Because much of the population-level evidence is ecological or observational, associations between biologic use and improvements in mortality and disability should be interpreted with caution and cannot be regarded as proof of direct causation. Biologics have unquestionably improved the lives of individual patients; whether they reduce the global burden of IBD will depend on equitable access, optimal positioning, and integration with treat-to-target strategies.

PMID:
42571398
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 18
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement