Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Second primary cancers in lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinaemia-cumulative burden without generalized excess cancer risk.

Created on 10 Aug 2026

Authors

Lars Munksgaard, Lars Moeller Pedersen, Lise Mette Rahbek Gjerdrum

Published in

British journal of haematology. Aug 09, 2026. Epub Aug 09, 2026.

Abstract

Second primary cancers (SPCs) are a survivorship concern in lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (LPL/WM), but estimates may be influenced by competing mortality and surveillance. We assessed cumulative incidence, relative risk and predictors of SPCs. We studied 521 patients diagnosed with LPL/WM in Region Zealand, Denmark, during 2000-2023. Cancers diagnosed >6 months before or after diagnosis were classified as prior malignancies and SPCs, respectively. Cumulative incidence was estimated with death as a competing event. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and absolute excess risks (AERs) used regional rates. SPC predictors were evaluated using Fine-Gray and Cox models. Median age was 72 years and median follow-up was 8.1 years. Prior malignancy was present in 64 patients (12.3%); 68 (13.1%) developed an SPC. Cumulative incidence was 9.3% at 5 years and 14.6% at 10 years; 166 patients (31.9%) died without a preceding SPC. With 1-year latency, overall cancer risk was not increased (SIR 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.40; AER 21.3 per 10 000 person-years). Haematological cancers showed borderline excess risk, driven by myelodysplastic syndrome. No covariates were associated with SPC risk. SPCs are clinically relevant in LPL/WM, although excess risk appears selective rather than broadly increased. Long-term surveillance should consider myeloid malignancies.

PMID:
42571919
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement