Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Association between clinician team structure and continuous pulse oximetry overuse among infants hospitalized with bronchiolitis: An Eliminating Monitor Overuse Trial substudy.

Created on 10 Aug 2026

Authors

Andrew S Kern-Goldberger, Jennifer A Faerber, Rui Xiao, Spandana Makeneni, Kimberly Albanowski, Canita R Brent, Halley Ruppel, Tina V Halley, Kaitlyn M McQuistion, Enrique F Schisterman, Rinad S Beidas, Christopher P Bonafide, Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings (PRIS) Network

Published in

Journal of hospital medicine. Aug 09, 2026. Epub Aug 09, 2026.

Abstract

Continuous pulse oximetry (cSpO2) monitoring for hospitalized children with bronchiolitis not requiring supplemental oxygen is an established form of medical overuse. We examined whether clinician team structure influences cSpO2 overuse. In this secondary analysis of the Eliminating Monitor Overuse (EMO) Trial (NCT05132322), we compared overuse by frontline clinician type (resident physician vs. attending physician or advanced practice provider [APP]) during the active cSpO2 deimplementation and sustainment phases using multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression. Among 4167 inpatient observations in 36 hospitals, 61% had their frontline care provided by residents, 27% by attendings, and 10% by APPs. In adjusted analyses, the odds of overuse were 47% higher among patients with frontline care delivered by attendings compared with residents (adjusted odds ratio: 1.47 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.93], p = .01), with no difference observed for APPs compared with residents. These findings suggest that cSpO2 overuse may be attenuated when residents deliver frontline patient care rather than attendings alone.

PMID:
42571927
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement