Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Related Incretin Therapies in Dermatology: Patient Selection and Shared Decision-Making.

Created on 10 Aug 2026

Authors

Somto Ndubisi, Peter Lio

Published in

Clinics in dermatology. Aug 09, 2026. Epub Aug 09, 2026.

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and related incretin therapies have moved rapidly from second-line diabetes agents to widely prescribed cardiometabolic medications, and dermatologists increasingly encounter patients who are already taking them. Obesity is common among dermatology patients and is particularly prevalent in psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa, yet most eligible patients are not receiving GLP-1 RA therapy, and nearly all prescriptions originate outside dermatology. This positions dermatologists at the intersection of two distinct clinical questions: how to manage the cutaneous consequences of therapy in patients already receiving these agents, and when to raise the possibility of treatment in patients who may benefit. This narrative review examines patient selection, including the metabolic and inflammatory phenotypes most likely to see dermatologic benefit, and the practical demands of therapy that influence whether treatment succeeds. It reviews the dermatology-relevant adverse effects that patients most often notice, including facial volume loss, hair shedding, and gastrointestinal intolerance, along with a monitoring approach suited to the dermatology visit. Throughout, it argues that shared decision-making offers a useful framework for an area where the evidence is still evolving and where treatment can reshape how patients look and feel.

PMID:
42571802
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement