Incidence and relative risk of negative outcomes of psychological interventions for pediatric posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors

Thole H Hoppen, Sophie Schlüter, Marielle Placzek, Anna S Lindemann, Ahlke Kip, Pascal Schlechter, Richard Meiser-Stedman, Nexhmedin Morina

Published in

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines. Aug 10, 2026. Epub Aug 10, 2026.

Abstract

Negative outcomes of psychological treatments for pediatric posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been underresearched. Although reporting has increased over the years, a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis is lacking.
We conducted a preregistered systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020206290) and followed PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and PTSDpubs were systematically searched from inception to May 13, 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychotherapies for pediatric PTSD with ≥10 participants per arm. Two independent coders extracted data and assessed risk of bias.
Seventy-two RCTs (N = 5,677) met inclusion criteria. Of these, 69, 6, and 19 reported the incidence of all-cause dropout, deterioration of PTSD, and adverse events, respectively. Most trials (74%) investigated trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT). Random effects meta-analysis showed that 7.87% of patients (95% CI, 4.07-12.55; I² = 82%) dropped out, with no significant difference relative to passive controls (RR = 1.04, 95% CI, 0.64-1.69; I² = 53%). Less than 0.01% (95% CI, 0.00-2.39; I² = 0%) of patients reported deterioration after TF-CBT, compared to 1.26% (95% CI, 0.00-8.13; I² = 40%) of passive controls. Limited data prohibited isolated review of other treatments. The incidence of adverse events during psychological treatments was also uncommon (0.29%, 95% CI, 0.00-2.67; I² = 34%) and similar to passive controls (1.14%, 95% CI, 0.00-8.02; I² = 84%).
Psychological treatments for pediatric PTSD-with most accumulated evidence for TF-CBT-appear safe and acceptable for the vast majority of children and adolescents with PTSD, which is encouraging for clinical practice. Reporting on deterioration and adverse events was scarce, limiting statistical power. Negative outcomes should be routinely assessed in clinical practice and future research, using validated measures and clearly defined constructs. Future work should distinguish serious adverse events and adverse events.

PMID:
42572827
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.