Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

PinPointer: An offline error measurement system for motor behavior research.

Created on 10 Aug 2026

Authors

Milton E T Marin, Michael B F Cabrera, Joshua R Samson, Juliana O Parma, Alyssa Kubota

Published in

Behavior research methods. Volume 58. Issue 9. Aug 10, 2026. Epub Aug 10, 2026.

Abstract

The ability to precisely and accurately measure the distance between an implement and target point (i.e., the radial error) is crucial to conducting rigorous motor behavior research. However, manually measuring this error after each trial may be time-consuming and error-prone. In this paper, we present PinPointer, an error measurement system that enables motor behavior researchers to quickly and easily calculate x-axis, y-axis, and radial error distances. PinPointer automatically calculates descriptive statistical measures for each error type which can be exported for additional analysis. Our inter-rater and intra-rater reliability evaluations reveal that PinPointer has perfect absolute agreement and perfect consistency across eight raters and near-perfect to perfect intra-rater absolute agreement between two ratings of the same rater. PinPointer also demonstrated perfect fidelity to real-world measurements. PinPointer's Python-based source code is available as free and open source for other researchers to use and easily modify for their own applications and requirements. In addition, the PinPointer executable can be run on Windows or MacOS without installation or knowledge of Python programming. We hope PinPointer will prove to be a useful tool for motor behavior researchers to improve the speed, accuracy, and reliability of their error measurements.

PMID:
42573904
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement