Comparison of Brain Age With Standard MRI Assessment for Dementia Risk Stratification in Subjective and Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors

Stefan De Vries, Katalin Farkas, Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester, Argonde Corien Van Harten, Calvin Trieu, Alle Meije Wink, Lyduine E Collij, Jyrki Lötjönen, Wiesje M Van Der Flier, Frederik Barkhof, Bas Jasperse, Mara Ten Kate

Published in

Neurology. Volume 107. Issue 5. Pages e218418. Sep 08, 2026. Epub Aug 10, 2026.

Abstract

Early dementia risk-stratification is crucial for timely intervention. Brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD) derived from structural MRI reflects the gap between computer-estimated age and chronological age and has been linked to clinical progression to dementia. We evaluate whether brain-PAD has prognostic value for progression to dementia in subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and whether brain-PAD provides added value beyond visual rating scales.
This retrospective cohort study included patients with SCD and MCI with up to 10-year follow-up assessments from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort and SCIENCe project. Brain-PAD was computed from baseline MRI using 2 pretrained methods. Cox proportional hazards models assessed the association between brain-PAD and risk of progression to dementia, controlling for age, sex, Mini Mental State Examination, and visual rating scales. We tested interactions between brain-PAD and baseline diagnosis to assess stage-specific value and evaluated the added value beyond amyloid status in a biomarker-available subset.
The study included 799 patients (SCD 412, MCI 387; 39.4% female, 63.3 ± 8.0 years). During a median follow-up of 3.2 years, 235 (29.4%) progressed to dementia. Higher brain-PAD was associated with an increased risk of progression to dementia (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06) and improved model fit beyond visual ratings (χ² = 12.24, p = 0.003). Following a significant interaction between brain-PAD and baseline diagnosis (p = 0.013), stratified analyses demonstrated brain-PAD was a stronger predictor in SCD (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03-1.15) than in MCI (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99-1.04). In SCD, brain-PAD improved model fit beyond visual rating scales (χ² = 10.17, p = 0.003) and modestly increased discrimination (C-index +0.02). A data-driven brain-PAD cutoff of -2.6 years corresponded to a high negative predictive value (0.91-0.99) over 2-10 years. Although brain-PAD improved model fit beyond amyloid status (χ² = 6.44, p = 0.018), it did not improve discrimination. In MCI, brain-PAD provided no additional value (χ² = 0.88, p = 0.351).
MRI-derived brain-PAD predicts progression to dementia in memory clinic patients with SCD or MCI. In particular, brain-PAD provided additional predictive value to visual rating scales in patients with SCD.

PMID:
42574695
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.