Orbital computed tomography biomarkers for the assessment of activity of Thyroid Eye Disease.

Authors

Bo Sook Han, Min Seok Seo, Eun Soo Kim, Ye-Seul Song, Min Joung Lee

Published in

PloS one. Volume 21. Issue 8. Pages e0349838. Epub Aug 10, 2026.

Abstract

To investigate the relationship between orbital metrics obtained using computed tomography (CT) imaging and inflammatory activity in thyroid eye disease (TED).
This retrospective study analyzed the medical records and CT images of 85 patients with TED and 15 controls. Orbital segmentation was performed using commercially available software. The volumes and densities of the extraocular muscles (EOMs), intraorbital fat, and lacrimal gland were measured. CT parameters were compared among the control, active TED, and inactive TED groups. Patients were further classified into two subgroups based on disease severity: mild TED and moderate to severe TED, and CT parameters were compared in each severity subgroup.
Patients with active TED showed significantly higher thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin levels than patients with inactive TED (p < 0.001). Orbital CT analysis revealed that the EOM volume was significantly larger in the active TED than in the inactive TED and control groups (p < 0.001). Additionally, intraorbital fat density was higher in patients with active TED (p < 0.001), whereas intraorbital fat volume and EOM density showed no significant differences between the groups. Lacrimal gland parameters did not differ significantly between the groups. Subgroup analysis based on TED severity also indicated that EOM volumes were larger and intraorbital fat densities were higher in the active TED than in the inactive TED (all p < 0.05).
Orbital CT revealed significant differences in EOM volume and intraorbital fat density between patients with active and inactive TED. These findings suggest that quantitative CT analysis may be useful for assessing TED activity.

PMID:
42574381
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.