Contrasting marine and terrestrial responses of South Asian summer monsoon system caused by hemispheric insolation.

Authors

Qin Wen, Zhengyu Liu, Tao Wang, Chengwei Ji, Jian Liu, Hai Cheng, Mi Yan, Liang Ning, Zhaowei Jing, Heng Liu, Jing Lei, Jiuyou Lu, Felix Creutzig, Qiuzhen Yin

Published in

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Volume 123. Issue 33. Pages e2602012123. Aug 18, 2026. Epub Aug 10, 2026.

Abstract

South Asian summer monsoon (SASM) delivers substantial rains to the Indian subcontinent and drives strong upwelling in the Arabian Sea, making marine upwelling records and terrestrial rainfall records two primary proxies for reconstructing past SASM variability. However, on orbital timescales, these two sets of records vary largely in opposite directions: the upwelling records are in-phase with Southern Hemisphere (SH) summer insolation, whereas the rainfall records are in-phase with Northern Hemisphere (NH) summer insolation. This leaves a long-standing debate on whether SASM is driven by NH or SH insolation. Here, combining paleoclimate records with transient climate simulations that explicitly separate the effects of the NH and SH insolation forcing, we show that the SASM rainfall is dominated by the NH insolation, whereas the Arabian Sea upwelling is forced predominantly by the SH insolation. When boreal summer occurs at perihelion, insolation is strongly enhanced not only in the NH but also in the tropical-subtropical SH. The former enhances the SASM rainfall through Eurasian warming, while the latter weakens the Arabian Sea upwelling by inducing South African warming and subsequent atmospheric teleconnections over the Indian Ocean. Our study reconciles the long-standing debate, and more broadly, reveals that warming in South Africa could exert a significant and previously overlooked remote forcing on the SASM system in past and future climate changes.

PMID:
42574609
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.