Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Preoperative Prediction of Pathologic Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Metabolic Response-Based Predictive Model.

Created on 11 Aug 2026

Authors

Hironobu Suto, Yoshio Shimizu, Takuro Fuke, Hiroyuki Matsukawa, Yasuhisa Ando, Minoru Oshima, Koji Fujita, Kiyoyuki Kobayashi, Hideki Kobara, Keiichi Okano

Published in

Journal of surgical oncology. Aug 10, 2026. Epub Aug 10, 2026.

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) is increasingly employed for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), yet reliable preoperative predictors of pathologic tumor regression are limited. We developed predictive models for pathologic response following NACRT.
We analyzed prospectively collected Phase II trial data from 169 patients with resectable and borderline resectable PDAC who underwent pancreatic resection after NACRT. Pathologic response was assessed using the College of American Pathologists (CAP) grading system and dichotomized as CAP grades 0-2 versus grade 3. Model A used baseline variables; Model B incorporated post-treatment preoperative and treatment-related variables. Performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC).
Among 169 patients, 81 (47.9%) achieved CAP grades 0-2. Model A found no independent baseline predictors (AUC 0.642). In Model B, post-treatment maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) emerged as the sole independent predictor of CAP grades 0-2 (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.67-0.96, p = 0.014). Model discrimination was higher with Model B (AUC: 0.745 vs 0.642; p = 0.006 by DeLong test). Risk stratification indicated CAP grade 0-2 rates of 27%, 42%, and 83% (p < 0.001).
Model B improved the prediction of pathologic response after NACRT, with post-treatment SUVmax as the sole independent predictor.

PMID:
42574598
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement