Authors
Kaushik Amancherla, Angela M Taravella Oill, Xavier Bledsoe, Arianna L Williams, Nelson Chow, Anna J Smith, Melissa A Farrow, Shilin Zhao, Quanhu Sheng, David W Bearl, Alexander N Perez, Robert D Hoffman, Jonathan N Menachem, Hasan K Siddiqi, Douglas M Brinkley, Evan D Mee, Niran Hadad, Vineet Agrawal, Jeffrey Schmeckpepper, Aniket Rali, Stacy Tsai, Eric Farber-Eger, Quinn S Wells, Jane E Freedman, Nathan R Tucker, Jeffrey M Spraggins, Kelly H Schlendorf, Eric R Gamazon, Nicholas Banovich, Ravi V Shah
Published in
Nature cardiovascular research. Aug 10, 2026. Epub Aug 10, 2026.
Abstract
Allograft rejection following solid-organ transplantation is a major cause of graft dysfunction and mortality. Current diagnostic approaches rely on histology, which exhibits wide diagnostic variability and lacks clinically relevant molecular phenotyping. Here we leverage image-based spatial transcriptomics at subcellular resolution in longitudinal human cardiac biopsies to characterize transcriptional heterogeneity in 62 adult and pediatric heart transplant recipients during and following histologically diagnosed rejection. Across 28 cell types, we identified significant differences in abundance in immune and parenchymal cells across different classes of rejection. We observed broad overlap in transcriptional states across rejection severity and significant heterogeneity within rejection grades. Responders and nonresponders to augmented therapies had distinct transcriptomic profiles, with nonresponders exhibiting baseline T cell hyperactivation and tissue remodeling genes. We also identified cell-specific genes linked to long-term outcomes after heart transplant. These results underscore the importance of subtyping cellular states during rejection to stratify immune-cardiac interactions relevant to short- and long-term outcomes.
PMID:
42576067
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Aug 2026.
Read full publication at:
Please sign in
to see all details.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 4
- Comments 0