Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Item Level Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Ureteroscopy for Kidney Stones- Plan Your Chores, Cancel Your Plans.

Created on 11 Aug 2026

Authors

Justin B Ziemba, Amanda Jones, Hanna Stambakio, Gregory E Tasian, Jing Huang

Published in

Urology. Aug 10, 2026. Epub Aug 10, 2026.

Abstract

To examine item level changes in PROMIS pain interference and ability to participate in social roles and activities following ureteroscopy (URS).
A prospective cohort study was conducted at a single academic center from 2020-2022. Adults undergoing URS for nephrolithiasis completed PROMIS pain interference (computer-adaptive test, 15 subdomains) and ability to participate in social roles and activities (short-form 8a, 8 subdomains) at baseline and at postoperative days (POD) 1, 7, 14, and 30. The primary outcome was a minimal clinically important difference (MCID, ≥5 points) in T-score from baseline to POD 1. Pairwise comparisons were assessed for change from baseline to each POD using linear mixed-effects models.
A total of 178 participants were enrolled. For pain interference, only 2 of 15 items - work around the home and day-to-day activities - demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant worsening at POD 1 (change +5.9 and +5.7, respectively; both p<0.01), persisting through POD 7 before recovering by POD 30. In contrast, 6 of 8 social participation items worsened significantly at POD 1 (change -5.2 to -6.8 points; all p<0.01), with full recovery by POD 30.
URS produces a specific, task-limited impact on pain interference but a comprehensive reduction in social participation both in and outside the home. These item-level findings offer actionable targets for patient counseling and anticipatory guidance prior to surgery.

PMID:
42575365
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement