Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Comparison of Palliative Care Access Between Patients With Liver Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Nationwide Population-Based Study.

Created on 11 Aug 2026

Authors

Jung Sil Jang, Si Nae Oh, Haeyong Pak

Published in

Journal of Korean medical science. Volume 41. Issue 31. Pages e202. Aug 10, 2026. Epub Aug 10, 2026.

Abstract

In August 2017, Republic of Korea (South Korea) expanded its national hospice and palliative care program to cover several serious non-cancer illnesses, including liver cirrhosis (LC). We aimed to examine the access of palliative care services among adults who died of LC compared with those who died of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using National Health Insurance Service data, including adults who died of LC or HCC between 2018 and 2022. Associations between cause of death (LC vs. HCC) and advance care planning (ACP) completion and receipt of hospice and palliative care services were estimated using multivariable logistic regression.
The final analytic cohort comprised 44,787 patients died from LC (71% women; mean age, 66 years) and 58,685 patients died from HCC (67% women; mean age, 70 years). Patients with LC had significantly lower rates of ACP completion (23.1 vs. 31.2%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.765; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.723-0.809; P < 0.001) and hospice and palliative care service utilization (3.7% vs. 9.1%; aOR, 0.558; 95% CI, 0.499-0.623; P < 0.001) compared to those with HCC.
Despite nationwide coverage of hospice and palliative care services, LC decedents remained less likely than HCC decedents to complete ACP or receive hospice and palliative-care services in Korea.

PMID:
42576718
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement