Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A hedonic perspective on exercise intentions: cross-sectional associations with intensity preference, tolerance, and passion.

Created on 11 Aug 2026

Authors

Filipe Rodrigues, Pedro Duarte-Mendes, Rita Soares, Diogo S Teixeira

Published in

Frontiers in psychology. Volume 17. Pages 1891893. Epub Jul 27, 2026.

Abstract

This cross-sectional study examined the associations of exercise intensity preference and tolerance with passion and the intention to continue exercising.
A total of 284 fitness center members (140 females, 144 males; M age = 29.84, SD = 9.27) were recruited. Participants were independently stratified into light-to-moderate and moderate-to-vigorous profiles based on intensity traits.
Descriptive results showed that harmonious passion (HP) was consistently higher than obsessive passion (OP) across all profiles, peaking in the moderate-to-vigorous preference group (M = 5.47). Linear regression models, explaining 8%-26% of the variance (R 2 = 0.08-0.26), indicated that HP was significantly associated with stronger exercise intentions across all groups (β = 0.53 in the moderate-to-vigorous tolerance stratum). Conversely, OP displayed negative associations with intention, particularly in the moderate-to-vigorous tolerance group (β = -0.18). Furthermore, intensity preference was positively associated with intentions.
These findings suggest that individuals who self-select their training intensity may report higher persistence intentions due to positive hedonic responses. We conclude that exercise prescription may benefit from accounting for individual intensity preferences and fostering harmonious passion to support positive exercise intentions.

PMID:
42577264
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement