Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Bibliometric analysis of high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Created on 11 Aug 2026

Authors

Min Li, Rong Ou, Wanhui Zheng

Published in

Frontiers in research metrics and analytics. Volume 11. Pages 1849512. Epub Jul 27, 2026.

Abstract

This study analyzes global literature on High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU), presenting its research distribution, thematic domains, and developmental trajectory.
Data from the Web of Science were analyzed using InCites, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer to examine co-occurrence patterns, research hotspots, and citation bursts among countries, institutions, authors, and keywords.
HIFU research progressed slowly from 1994 to 2002, experienced rapid growth from 2003 to 2012, and entered a stable, high-output phase from 2013 to 2024. The United States and China led in both research output and impact, whereas Europe showed lower output but outstanding research quality. The primary research directions encompassed basic and clinical studies, technical optimization, and evaluations of safety and efficacy.
Over the past three decades, HIFU research has evolved from foundational exploration to rapid expansion and technological maturation. Global HIFU research now presents substantial opportunities, driven by expanding clinical indications, growing demand for non-invasive therapies, and integration with imaging guidance, drug delivery, and precision medicine. However, its transition toward standardized clinical application still requires higher-quality evidence, large-scale multicenter studies, greater methodological rigor, and further improvements in treatment reproducibility, long-term efficacy, and international standardization.

PMID:
42577192
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement