Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Transcriptomic Insights into the Life-History and Population Responses of Brachionus plicatilis to Artificial Light at Night.

Created on 11 Aug 2026

Authors

Qingqing Yu, Tianyang Xu, Yiru Shen, Siying Tao, Gongyuan Wang, Jae-Seong Lee, Zhou Yang, Yunfei Sun

Published in

Environmental science & technology. Volume 60. Issue 31. Pages 21927-21937. Aug 11, 2026.

Abstract

Artificial light at night (ALAN), intensified by coastal urbanization, is an emerging threat to coastal ecosystems. We used the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis and its prey Phaeocystis globosa as a model predator-prey system to examine rotifer life-history traits, predator-prey dynamics, and transcriptomic responses under varying ALAN intensities. ALAN altered maturation timing without affecting lifespan, and it reduced fecundity, population growth, and clearance rate, thereby delaying the depletion of P. globosa. Transcriptomic and network analyses showed that rotifers exposed to ALAN exhibited altered expression of candidate regulatory genes, including cytoskeleton-associated protein 5 (ckap5) and Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (raf) family members. These changes were associated with a CKAP5-associated microtubule module, RAF/PKA-related signaling, reproductive and cell-cycle-related pathways, and FoxO/autophagy-associated cellular-maintenance processes. These molecular responses provide potential regulatory clues for interpreting the phenotypic changes observed under ALAN exposure. Our findings help evaluate the potential effects of ALAN on zooplankton performance, and provide a scientific basis for assessing the environmental risks of coastal light pollution.

PMID:
42579102
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement