Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Rhinomusca as a possible vector of Habronema in Kenya.

Created on 11 Aug 2026

Authors

S Mihok, R Kock, R F Kruger, R Giordano

Published in

Journal of helminthology. Volume 100. Pages e87. Aug 11, 2026. Epub Aug 11, 2026.

Abstract

Translocations of rhinoceros in the 1990s provided an opportunity to investigate the vectors of filaria in Nairobi National Park and Solio Ranch in Kenya. These are high-altitude sanctuaries where rhinos have ulcerative sores attributed to the filarial nematode Stephanofilaira dinniki. Rhinomusca dutoiti, the biting fly closely associated with rhino, did not harbour S. dinniki, but often harboured a small and/or a large form of Habronema. Rhinomusca dutoiti from Kenya was nearly identical to R. dutoiti from South Africa based on gross morphology and a 798 base pair sequence from the 3' end of the Cytochrome Oxidase I gene. Habronema parasites occurred alone or in combination and were smaller than larval forms of H. muscae, the well-known parasite of equines. At Nairobi, prevalence of infections in the proboscis was high at 55%, with mature infections already present in young flies. This finding implied infection during larval development rather than acquisition as an adult fly. Infection patterns were similar in flies trapped or captured by hand from rhinos at Solio Ranch. Habronema was also found in a few Haematobosca spp., at much lower prevalence. Parasites were measured for several body landmarks and were photographed through light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. These data now provide a foundation for further studies of the biology of Rhinomusca and its relationship with filarial nematodes in wildlife.

PMID:
42578361
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement