Assessing Different Machine Learning Algorithms to Identify Traumatic Cardiac Arrest.

Authors

Signe Amalie Wolthers, Mehdi Parviz, Caroline Kamuk Ostenfeldt, Annette Kjær Ersbøll, Theo Walther Jensen, Mathias Geldermann Holgersen, Lars Bredevang Andersen, Stig Nikolaj Fasmer Blomberg, Søren Mikkelsen, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Helle Collatz Christensen

Published in

Annals of epidemiology. Pages 110245. Aug 11, 2026. Epub Aug 11, 2026.

Abstract

Traumatic cardiac arrest differs from non-traumatic regarding epidemiology. This study evaluated five machine learning classifiers' ability to identify traumatic cardiac arrest in the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry, which currently relies on manual review.
This retrospective study employed split sampling to train and test models using medical records of cardiac arrest patients from 2016 to 2021. Data were preprocessed, resampled, and classified using five classification models. Shapley Additive Explanations values were used to explain the models' predictions except for the BERT model.
30,171 medical records included, with 985 involving traumatic cardiac arrests. The histogram gradient boosting model achieved the highest F1-score of 0.62, with precision (positive predictive value) of 0.61 and recall (sensitivity) of 0.62. The BERT model demonstrated a recall of 0.96, a precision of 0.21, and an F1-score of 0.35. For histogram gradient boosting and random forest, the increasing presence of "car", "thorax", and "head" was linked to trauma. Further error analysis revealed that these models exhibited age-related bias by implicitly learning that traumatic cardiac arrest is more common in younger populations and less frequent in older populations.
This study represents the first steps towards using machine learning algorithms to support manual validation of the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry. Histogram gradient boosting yielded the best overall results; however, the BERT model demonstrated significantly improved recall in detecting trauma cases. Hence, applying the BERT model to the validation would substantially reduce the present workload.

PMID:
42580567
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.