Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Association of the TNFRSF1A genotype with lung function impairment in patients with sarcoidosis.

Created on 13 Aug 2026

Authors

A G Lunde, S Romundstad, A H Henriksen, H Sorger, E Boerner, N Schröder, F Bonella

Published in

Scientific reports. Volume 16. Issue 1. May 05, 2026. Epub May 05, 2026.

Abstract

The single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs1800693 in the tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1) gene leads to the formation of a protein-mimicking effect of TNF-α inhibitors, which are agents used to treat sarcoidosis. We investigated the association between rs1800693 and disease progression in two populations with non-Lofgren sarcoidosis (nLS). We genotyped two nLS cohorts (Ruhrlandklinik, Germany, n = 108, and the HUNT study, Norway, n = 393), and two control groups with (n = 313) and without (n = 2414) COPD for rs1800693 (A/G polymorphism). Pulmonary function tests at inclusion and at the end of follow-up were compared according to genotype. The mean follow-up times were 6.5 (German) and 7.9 (Norwegian) years. German AA patients had an absolute decline in %pred FVC (-8.5, 95% CI -3.4, -13.6) and DLco (-4.9, 95% CI -0.1, -9.7). In AG/GG (G+), the absolute decline in FVC was less pronounced (-3.9, 95% CI -1.1, -6.8), and DLco was stable. In the Norwegian patients, the decrease in lung function was similar between the AA and G+ groups. Compared with homozygous GG, homozygous AA was associated with a lower FVC %pred at baseline (-5.7, 95% CI -0.2, -11.6) and at the end of follow-up (-7.0, 95% CI -0.1, -14.0). Genotype was not associated with lung function in either control group. TNFR1 rs1800693 might be associated with lung function impairment and decline in non-Lofgren sarcoidosis patients.

PMID:
42086639
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement