Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

[The disinfection technology with bleaching powder for drinking water in Shanghai from 1920 to 1983].

Created on 13 Aug 2026

Authors

Y Yang, S M Song

Published in

Zhonghua yi shi za zhi (Beijing, China : 1980). Volume 56. Issue 4. Pages 236-240. Jul 28, 2026.

Abstract

Bleaching powder served as the primary disinfectant for drinking water in both urban and rural areas in Shanghai from 1920 to 1983, particularly in rural regions. The liquid chlorine disinfection was introduced by the Yangshupu Water Plant in 1920, marking the inception of chlorination disinfection practice in China. The measures for a drinking water sanitation management framework, taken by the Shanghai health administrative authorities in the late 1920s, laid the foundation for the widespread adoption of bleaching powder. Bleaching powder was extensively applied to public water sources including wells and riverbanks against cholera during the 1930s. In terms of technological practice, bleaching powder was used directly as powder, then gradually improved as liquid, followed by chlorine bleach tablets. After that, two chlorination methods were developed: single-dose chlorination and continuous chlorination in order to solve problems such as poor stability, excessive residue and inaccurate dosing. The driving force for the use of bleaching powder and epidemic prevention was technology dissemination to support public health led by the government. Bleaching powder disinfection represented a pivotal shift from traditional empirical approaches to modern chemical treatment of decentralized drinking water systems in Shanghai, meeting the practical demands for stability, convenience and safety.

PMID:
42586798
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement