Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Self-Reported Dietary Carotenoid Intake and Skin Carotenoid Score Status in a Geographically Diverse U.S. Sample.

Created on 13 Aug 2026

Authors

Saima Hasnin, Susan B Sisson, Stephanie Jilcott Pitts, Justin D Dvorak, Taren Massey Swindle, Shanon L Casperson, Ashlea Braun, Jonathan Baldwin, Emily Lynn, Virginia C Stage

Published in

Nutrients. Volume 18. Issue 15. Aug 03, 2026. Epub Aug 03, 2026.

Abstract

Background: The reflection spectroscopy (RS)-based skin carotenoid score (SCS) has been validated to assess carotenoid intake. However, associations between the SCS and individual dietary carotenoid species have been inconsistently reported in the previous literature. This study examined the utility of using a carotenoid screener along with RS to assess individual dietary carotenoid species intake among U.S. adults. Methods: Adults (N = 280) from eight U.S. sites completed a 44-item carotenoid intake screener to estimate total and individual dietary carotenoid intake (α-carotene, β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lutein + zeaxanthin, and lycopene) over the past 7 days. Each participant's SCS was measured using two Veggie Meter® devices. Spearman's Rank correlation tests and linear mixed models with a random intercept for site were conducted. Results: Mean (± Standard Deviations) carotenoid intake ranged from 21,226.8 ± 9914.1 to 28,863.5 ± 22,462.2 µg/day, and mean SCS ranged from 229.2 ± 72.3 to 325.6 ± 94.1 across the eight sites. Participants' SCS was significantly associated with self-reported total carotenoids (mg)/week (rs = 0.2 and B = 0.11; p < 0.01) and with all individual carotenoids (rs ranged from 0.15 to 0.23, p < 0.01; B ranged from 0.11 to 21.1, p < 0.01), except lycopene. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that combining the carotenoid intake screener with RS may offer a practical approach for assessing individual carotenoid species intake in adults.

PMID:
42588138
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement