Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Serum 25(OH)D Levels and Dental Caries Experience in Children: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Created on 13 Aug 2026

Authors

Çiğdem Güler, Emine Yurdakul Ertürk, Didem Odabaşı, Emre Serhan Alper

Published in

Oral health & preventive dentistry. Volume 24. Pages 643-648. Aug 13, 2026. Epub Aug 13, 2026.

Abstract

The relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels and dental caries in children remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between current serum 25(OH)D levels and dental caries experience in children.
This cross-sectional study included children aged 3 to 15 years without systemic disease who presented to the Department of Pediatrics, Ordu University Training and Research Hospital, Ordu, Turkey, between November and December 2023. Serum 25(OH)D levels obtained from routine blood tests and intraoral examinations performed on the same day were evaluated retrospectively. Dental caries experience was assessed using dmft and DMFT indices according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between serum 25(OH)D levels and caries experience.
A total of 326 children were included (172 girls, 52.8%; 154 boys, 47.2%). The mean serum 25(OH)D level was 50.08 ± 16.68 nmol/l, and the mean combined caries index (decayed, missing, and filled primary teeth [dmft] and decayed, missing, and filled permanent teeth [DMFT]) was 3.66 ± 3.44. No statistically significant relationship was observed between serum 25(OH)D levels and caries experience (P > 0.05). Girls had statistically significantly lower serum 25(OH)D levels than boys (46.03 ± 15.21 nmol/l vs. 54.63 ± 17.10 nmol/l, P 0.001).
Within the limitations of this cross-sectional study, no statistically significantly relationship was found between current serum 25(OH)D levels and dental caries experience in children. Further longitudinal studies with comprehensive assessment of potential confounding factors are needed to better clarify this relationship.

PMID:
42593159
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement