Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Comparison of Gaussian and Laguerre-Gaussian beams propagating through anisotropic non-Kolmogorov atmospheric turbulence.

Created on 13 Aug 2026

Authors

Elaheh Adams, Miranda van Iersel

Published in

Applied optics. Volume 65. Issue 23. Pages 7711-7719. Aug 10, 2026.

Abstract

The performance of two types of optical beams in anisotropic turbulence is compared with respect to elliptical distortion, power retention, and beam broadening. The considered beams are the conventional Gaussian beam and the Laguerre-Gaussian (LG) beam with azimuthal mode indices (l=1) and (l=2). The comparison of elliptical distortion is conducted to evaluate each beam's ability to preserve its symmetric irradiance profile. The comparison of power confinement and broadening is performed to determine which beam remains more focused. This study was made possible by analytical solutions previously developed for each beam type and reported in two previously published papers. The analysis was carried out using two analytical approaches, the perturbation method and the extended Huygens-Fresnel principle, as well as a computational method: wave optics simulations. The obtained results suggest that the higher-order LG beam tends to remain more symmetric and confined, and that its amplitude and phase structure effectively contributes to this confinement. Following the higher-order mode, the lower-order LG beam also demonstrates better performance than the Gaussian beam. However, the degree of superiority depends on the analysis method employed. The power-law exponent is shown to significantly influence the predicted results. Depending on its value, the results obtained using different approaches may align or diverge. Furthermore, the effect of anisotropy exhibits saturation behavior, such that beyond a certain level of anisotropy, further increases produce only minimal additional changes in the beam shape.

PMID:
42593441
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement