Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Obesity as a determinant of radiation burden in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Created on 14 Aug 2026

Authors

Shaun Khanna, David Burgess, Gopal Sivagangabalan, Ajay J Kirtane, Nitesh Nerlekar, Eugenio Picano, Patrick W Serruys, Aditya Bhat

Published in

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions. Aug 13, 2026. Epub Aug 13, 2026.

Abstract

Patient obesity is now a common characteristic in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory, yet its impact on radiation exposure remains under-recognised. Increased body mass index impairs X-ray penetration, prompting fluoroscopy systems to increase radiation output to maintain image quality. Consequently, patients with obesity receive substantially higher radiation doses across coronary, electrophysiological, haemodynamic, and structural heart procedures, while operators experience disproportionate increases in scatter radiation, creating cumulative occupational risk. Obesity also increases procedural complexity through more challenging vascular access, prolonged fluoroscopy, suboptimal shielding, and steeper imaging projections, further amplifying radiation burden. This review synthesises current evidence demonstrating obesity as a major procedural determinant of radiation exposure and proposes a practical obesity-aware framework incorporating fluoroscopy optimisation, shielding strategies, real-time dosimetry, enhanced radiation protection devices, workflow adaptations, and institutional quality improvement. Recognising body habitus as a core procedural variable is essential to improving radiation safety for both patients and healthcare workers while informing future obesity-specific radiation protocols.

PMID:
42595579
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement