Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Long-term retention of paralytic shellfish toxins in a Pacific Arctic bivalve population.

Created on 14 Aug 2026

Authors

Evangeline Fachon, Patrick Charapata, Kathi A Lefebvre, Emily Bowers, Kali Horn, Nathaniel Spada, Donald M Anderson

Published in

Harmful algae. Volume 158. Pages 103161. Epub Jun 11, 2026.

Abstract

Massive and highly toxic blooms of the dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella have raised widespread concern about ecosystem health and food security in Pacific Arctic waters. The paralytic shellfish toxins (PSTs) produced by this species are now detected widely throughout the regional food web, yet persistence of these toxins within the ecosystem following a bloom has remained largely uncharacterized. In this study, we evaluated toxin retention in the bivalve species Macoma calcarea, a key member of the Pacific Arctic benthic community which is consumed by marine mammals and seabirds. Over three years (2022-2024), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to measure PST content of Macoma collected from the southern Chukchi Sea, as well as two cohorts maintained under long-term (∼1 year) laboratory depuration conditions. Results from these analyses revealed that Macoma retain PSTs for over a year following bloom exposure, allowing this species to serve as a long-term reservoir for phycotoxins in the Pacific Arctic food web. The relative toxin profiles of Macoma changed significantly over time and were distinctly different from the algal population, indicative of biotransformation and/or differential retention. Moving forward, continued investigation of toxin dynamics in Arctic taxa will be essential in assessing risks related to bloom events in Pacific Arctic waters.

PMID:
42595409
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement