Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Hybrid compensation method for testing large-aperture low-sag freeform mirrors.

Created on 14 Aug 2026

Authors

Hongshi Li, Qiang Cheng, Zhuofei Ding, Longxiang Li, Jia Li, Yushan Han, Donglin Xue, Xuejun Zhang

Published in

Optics express. Volume 34. Issue 15. Pages 28478-28495. Jul 27, 2026.

Abstract

A computer-generated hologram (CGH) is a high-precision method for testing complex surfaces. However, its applicability is limited by the aperture constraints of the fabrication equipment, rendering it challenging to effectively measure large-aperture, high-precision freeform mirrors. In this study, we propose a hybrid compensation approach combining CGH and a spherical mirror for testing large-aperture low-sag freeform mirrors. By introducing a virtual equivalent surface, we developed a hybrid computational method to calculate the CGH phase function. An interferometric data-processing model was established by incorporating mapping distortion correction, surface error reconstruction, and spherical mirror error removal. Experimental validation was performed on a rounded rectangular off-axis freeform mirror with a clear aperture of 698 mm × 210 mm, and comparative measurements were conducted using Dutch United Instruments. Root mean square density analysis shows that the hybrid compensation method achieves a low-frequency measurement accuracy of 3.6 nm root mean square (RMS) and a clear aperture surface measurement accuracy of 8.3 nm RMS. This method enables high-precision testing of large-aperture, low-sag freeform surfaces, and the spherical mirror compensator demonstrates a degree of general applicability.

PMID:
42596474
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement