Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Preparation and Evaluation of In-House Multi-Analyte Quality Control Materials for ANA, Anti-dsDNA, and Autoantibody Profile Assays.

Created on 14 Aug 2026

Authors

Lin Xu, Hongxiang Xie

Published in

Annals of clinical biochemistry. Pages 45632261481996. Aug 14, 2026. Epub Aug 14, 2026.

Abstract

This study explored the preparation and evaluation of in-house quality control (QC) materials for antinuclear antibody (ANA) and anti-double-stranded DNA antibody (anti-dsDNA) testing by indirect immunofluorescence test (IIFT), and ANA profile testing by line immunoassay (LIA), with the aim of providing a reference for other in-house QC materials.
Patient sera were pooled to prepare a QC serum positive for all targets, while sera from healthy individuals were pooled to prepare a negative control. QC materials were heat-inactivated, centrifuged, aliquoted, and stored at -20 °C. Stability was assessed at 37 °C and during long-term storage at -20 °C. Inter-vial variation was evaluated using 20 vials, and intra-vial variation was assessed by 20 replicates of one vial.
During the 8-day 37 °C stability test, ANA and anti-dsDNA titers remained within ± 1 serial dilution of the baseline value, and all ANA profile antibodies remained within the predefined ± 20% acceptance criterion. During long-term storage, ANA and anti-dsDNA titers also remained within ± 1 serial dilution, and the CVs of all ANA profile antibodies were below 20%. Both inter-vial and intra-vial variation met predefined criteria, and all negative controls remained negative.
The in-house QC materials showed good stability and reproducibility, with simple preparation and potential suitability for routine use in primary healthcare laboratories.

PMID:
42599119
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 14 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement