Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Turbinate Surgery for Chronic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Created on 15 Aug 2026

Authors

Do Hyun Kim, David W Jang, Se Hwan Hwang

Published in

Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery. Aug 14, 2026. Epub Aug 14, 2026.

Abstract

To evaluate the treatment outcomes of various turbinate surgeries in patients with chronic rhinitis.
A systematic review and meta-analysis.
A systematic search was conducted using six databases. Treatment conditions included six surgical interventions-coblator-assisted turbinoplasty (CAT), laser ablation, microdebrider-assisted turbinoplasty (MAT), radiofrequency tissue volume reduction (RFVTR), submucosal diathermy (SMD) and partial inferior turbinectomy (PIT)-and a reference intervention (submucosal resection). Outcomes included symptom scores, turbinate size, operative time and surgery-related adverse effects such as atrophic changes, crusting, nasal dryness, mucosal tearing, revision rate and postoperative bleeding. Both pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed.
MAT was associated with better outcomes across most parameters but showed a higher risk of mucosal tearing. SMD was associated with lower effectiveness in alleviating nasal obstruction at 6-12 months and laser ablation was associated with reduced effectiveness in decreasing turbinate size. RFVTR exhibited the shortest operative time and was associated with advantages in minimising nasal dryness and preserving the mucosa. Regarding adverse effects, laser ablation was associated with an increased risk of atrophic rhinitis, PIT with a higher incidence of crusting and dryness and SMD with a greater likelihood of requiring revision surgery.
MAT was associated with relatively favourable outcomes across most parameters; however, it also showed a higher risk of mucosal tearing. RFVTR was associated with advantages in minimising nasal dryness and preserving mucosal integrity. Both SMD and laser ablation were associated with comparatively limited efficacy and relatively higher rates of adverse effects.

PMID:
42601322
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement