Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Implants for Complex Foot and Ankle Reconstruction: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes - A Current Concepts Review of the Literature.

Created on 15 Aug 2026

Authors

Pedro Nogueira, Amit Patel, Lucky Jeyaseelan, Zakir Haider, Sérgio Soares

Published in

The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Aug 14, 2026. Epub Aug 14, 2026.

Abstract

Critical-sized bone defects of the foot and ankle have traditionally been managed with bulk structural allograft or major amputation, both carrying substantial limitations, prompting exploration of patient-specific 3D-printed porous titanium implants as a structural alternative, though supporting evidence remains fragmented. Following the PRISMA 2020 statement and a pre-registered PROSPERO protocol, this current concepts review searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, identifying 22 clinical studies (4 Level III, 17 Level IV, 1 Level V; published 2015-2026) comprising 289 adult patients undergoing complex foot and ankle reconstruction with these implants; two independent reviewers performed screening, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment, with primary outcomes-osseous union, limb salvage, and major amputation-synthesized descriptively as pooled proportions, counting overlapping cohorts once. The pooled limb-salvage rate was 92% (196/214 limbs) and major amputation rate 8% (21/276 patients); among 13 studies reporting a patient-level union endpoint, pooled union was 89% (64/72 patients), with consistent functional improvement and a weighted mean follow-up of 25 months. However, the pooled reoperation rate reached 26% (74/289 patients), driven predominantly by deep infection, with prior ipsilateral infection (odds ratio 14.9) and neuropathy (odds ratio 5.76) as independent predictors; the single comparative study found significantly higher articular fusion and no implant subsidence versus femoral head allograft (p = 0.018 and p = 0.016, respectively). These implants achieve high limb-salvage and union rates with a low major amputation rate, offset by a substantial reoperation burden. Prospective comparative studies with standardized union definitions and longer follow-up are needed.
Level V (determined by the lowest level of evidence included).

PMID:
42600975
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement