Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Monosaccharide composition analysis of polysaccharides based on derivatization and non-derivatization strategies: A review.

Created on 15 Aug 2026

Authors

Li Xiao, Jia-Ning Gao, Si-Liang Jiang, Cheng-Run Jin, Xin Zhang, Hai-Xue Kuang, Jun Liang, Yong-Gang Xia

Published in

International journal of biological macromolecules. Pages 154068. Aug 14, 2026. Epub Aug 14, 2026.

Abstract

Complete hydrolysis of polysaccharides and stable recovery of monosaccharides are the core prerequisite for precise analysis of monosaccharide composition, a task further impeded by the structural diversity, high polarity, and lack of native chromophores of monosaccharides. To address these coupled challenges, this review constructs a complete analytical framework for monosaccharide analysis of polysaccharides, covering the workflow from hydrolysis optimization and detection method selection to precise qualitative and quantitative analysis. Derivatization and non-derivatization represent two complementary analytical strategies for monosaccharide analysis. Derivatization strategies, via targeted chemical modification of monosaccharides, enable simultaneous profiling of a broad spectrum of monosaccharides (aldoses, ketoses, uronic acids, and amino sugars), with significantly improved separation selectivity, detection sensitivity, and compatibility with gas chromatography (GC), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and mass spectrometry (MS). However, they are inherently limited by tedious pretreatment, risks of incomplete derivatization, side reactions and potential analyte loss. Non-derivatization approaches, represented by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC), high-performance anion-exchange chromatography (HPAEC) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), avoid laborious derivatization and related side reactions, serving as indispensable complementary tools. Nevertheless, some techniques face inherent bottlenecks, including poor trace-level sensitivity, limited selectivity in complex matrices, and insufficient chromatographic retention. By systematically comparing these two mainstream strategies, this review defines their applicable boundaries in detection sensitivity, qualitative and quantitative capabilities, and matrix compatibility, thus offering reliable guidance for monosaccharide composition analysis.

PMID:
42600814
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement