Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Percutaneous transesophageal gastric catheter removal and follow up: A case series.

Created on 15 Aug 2026

Authors

Karim A Zaazoue, Brittney Jabot, Alex Wallace, Zlatko Devcic, Gregory T Frey, Ricardo Paz-Fumagalli, Beau B Toskich, Charles A Ritchie

Published in

Radiology case reports. Volume 21. Issue 10. Pages 5199-5204. Epub Aug 06, 2026.

Abstract

Percutaneous transesophageal gastric catheter (PTEG) placement is an alternative technique for gastric decompression in patients who require long-term venting with contraindication(s) to traditional gastrostomy access (percutaneous, endoscopic, or surgical), such as primary or metastatic gastric cancer, refractory ascites, or altered anatomy. Despite growing evidence supporting PTEG's efficacy and safety especially for palliative care, literature on catheter removal, and follow-up is sparse. We present 4 cases of PTEG catheter removal in patients with malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) and contraindications to radiologic percutaneous gastrostomy (PG). Each case involved successful PTEG placement, followed by removal once symptoms resolved. Follow-up periods varied, with no reported complications postremoval and a median follow-up time of 599 (139-725) days. PTEG provides a viable alternative for patients requiring gastric decompression who are not candidates for PG. This case series demonstrates the safety and feasibility of PTEG catheter removal, even within the limitations of the sample size. This case series demonstrates that PTEG catheter removal after symptomatic relief of malignant bowel obstruction is safe. Further research is needed to better understand the long-term outcomes and to confirm these preliminary findings.

PMID:
42602934
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 15 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement