Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Effect of Tumor-Associated Sarcopenia on Swallowing Function in Patients with Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Created on 16 Aug 2026

Authors

Qiumei Li, Jinlie Lin, Liping Lin, Yigen Hong, Shaofeng Zhao

Published in

Journal of gastrointestinal cancer. Volume 57. Issue 1. Aug 15, 2026. Epub Aug 15, 2026.

Abstract

To explore whether the association between tumor-associated sarcopenia and dysphagia generalizes across tumor types and differs between head and neck cancer (HNC) and other cancers.
Eligible studies published before December 31, 2024 were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang Data. Heterogeneity was evaluated by the I2 statistic, with subgroup and meta-regression exploring heterogeneity sources. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis, Harbord's test and trim-and-fill analysis assessed result robustness and publication bias.
Twelve studies (n = 2,889) were included. Sarcopenia was significantly associated with dysphagia (OR = 2.82, 95% CI 1.94 to 4.29, P < 0.001) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 52.4%, P = 0.0172). Effect sizes were similar between HNC and other tumors (P = 0.9479). Sarcopenia assessment methods (P = 0.022) and dysphagia assessment tools (P = 0.018) independently explained heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis confirmed stable results; trim-and-fill analysis showed reliable findings despite minor publication bias (P = 0.55).
Sarcopenia is a universal independent associated factor for dysphagia across cancers, with no difference between HNC and other cancers. Routine screening and targeted interventions may reduce dysphagia risk and improve patient quality of life.

PMID:
42603192
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 17
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement