Reconstruction of hypopharynx after robotic versus conventional resection in hypopharyngeal cancer: a comparative pilot study.

Authors

Hyunwoo Yang, Seok-Jae Heo, Sol-Bin Yang, Hyounmin Kim, Eun-Bi Jang, Yoon Woo Koh, Dongwook Kim

Published in

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Volume 54. Issue 11. Pages 109850. Aug 15, 2026. Epub Aug 15, 2026.

Abstract

Hypopharyngeal cancer often requires wide surgical resection with free flap reconstruction. Robotic approaches are increasingly adopted to improve surgical access and reduce visible scarring, but direct comparative outcomes with conventional transcervical methods in patients requiring complex pharyngeal reconstruction remain underexplored. This retrospective comparative pilot study analyzed 19 consecutive patients who underwent curative hypopharyngectomy with neck dissection and immediate microvascular free flap reconstruction at Yonsei University Severance Hospital (2020-2024). Patients were divided into robotic alternative approaches (retroauricular and minimal transcervical, n = 10) and conventional transcervical (n = 9) groups. Primary outcomes included major postoperative complications (saliva pooling, dysphagia, stricture) and hospital stay duration. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups regarding major complications, hospital stay, or operation time. Total resection was associated with increased dysphagia risk (OR: 20.71, p = 0.030). Patients with saliva pooling had longer hospital stays (median: 65.5 vs 30.0 days; p = 0.029). Immediate controlled pharyngostoma formation reduced hospital stay compared with delayed intervention (35.0 ± 4.2 vs 72.0 ± 26.9 days; p = 0.020). Robotic alternative approaches demonstrated outcomes comparable to conventional methods while providing superior cosmetic results. Prophylactic controlled pharyngostoma may benefit selected high-risk patients; larger studies are warranted to confirm these preliminary findings.

PMID:
42603530
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.