Remote Telesurgery Versus Local Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Comparative Evidence Base.

Authors

Sara Ben Hmido, Houssam Abder Rahim, Faridi S van Etten-Jamaludin, Dirk Ubbink, Frank Bloemers

Published in

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS. Volume 22. Issue 4. Pages e70224.

Abstract

Remote telesurgery allows surgeons to operate over a distance using robotic systems and advanced networks. This review aims to compare remote telesurgery with local minimally invasive surgery (MIS) regarding patient outcomes and system-level outcomes.
A PRISMA-compliant systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42023474196) searched six databases to 1 August 2025 for studies comparing remote telesurgery with local MIS in living patients.
Among 5737 records, one retrospective cohort met the criteria. It compared 5G-enabled remote robotic pelvic fracture surgery (n = 80) with local robotic surgery (n = 80). Remote procedures had lower blood loss (20 vs. 50 mL) and shorter incisions (1.25 vs. 1.5 cm). Operative time did not significantly differ between groups (p = 0.177), and complications, hospital stay, and functional outcomes were similar.
Comparative data on telesurgery remain limited, and healthcare system benefits are unproven. Future studies should incorporate direct comparisons and systematically evaluate system-level outcomes.

PMID:
42603784
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.