Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Does pre-operative left ventricular function predict mitral valve function after anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery repair?

Created on 16 Aug 2026

Authors

Raji Venkitachalam, Katherine Cashen, Christopher W Mastropietro, Liyun Zhang, Yan Ke, Peter C Frommelt, Ronald K Woods, Collaborative Research from the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society (CoRe-PCICS) Investigators

Published in

JTCVS open. Volume 32. Pages 101873. Epub May 26, 2026.

Abstract

To compare the progression of mitral valve (MV) function before and after anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery (ALCAPA) repair in those with preserved versus impaired left ventricular (LV) function.
This is a post-hoc analysis of patients who underwent repair for ALCAPA at 22 Collaborative Research from the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Society centers. Mitral regurgitation (MR) severity was compared on the basis of LV function at diagnosis and through 3 years of follow-up.
Among 228 patients, 76 had normal/mild LV dysfunction and 152 had moderate/severe LV dysfunction (median ejection fraction 60% vs 23%, P < .0001). Preoperatively, moderate or greater MR was more common with moderate/severe LV dysfunction (51% vs 26%, P < .001). At 3-year follow-up, those with moderate or greater MR decreased significantly in this group (51% to 13%; odds ratio, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.05-0.25; P < .0001), with no significant change in the normal/mild LV dysfunction group (26% to 16%; OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.06-1.39; P = .12).
In patients with ALCAPA and MV dysfunction with preserved LV function, MV recovery is less common, highlighting the consideration for concomitant MV repair.

PMID:
42604338
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 16 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement