Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Terminal Filament Bundling Underlies the Development of Ovariole Number Dimorphism Between Queen and Worker Ants.

Created on 17 Aug 2026

Authors

Claire Ramsay, Paul Lasko, Ehab Abouheif

Published in

Evolution & development. Volume 28. Issue 3. Pages e70056.

Abstract

Reproductive division of labour is a key feature underlying the remarkable success of ants, where a reproductive queen caste and non-reproductive worker caste develop from a totipotent egg or larva. The number of ovarioles that develop after the egg or larva is determined to be a queen or worker caste ultimately determines their reproductive potential. Yet since very early descriptions of ant larval ovaries made by Ezhikov (1923) and Brian (1950s), the developmental basis of ovariole number dimorphism in ants has received little attention. Here, we revisit their work in light of more recent knowledge from Drosophila melanogaster, where terminal filaments (TFs) in the larval ovary determine ovariole number on a one-to-one basis. Ezhikov and Brian observed that queen and worker larval ovaries develop the same number of TFs, but in the worker caste, they 'bundle' together to form a single ovariole. Using in situ hybridisation chain reaction (HCR) on multiple queen and worker larval stages, we confirm this bundling process is present in two derived ant species with ovariole dimorphism, but is absent in a species that lacks it. Our findings therefore suggest that this terminal filament bundling reflects a mechanism evolved within ants to regulate differences in worker ovariole number between castes independently of overall number of terminal filaments. This work sheds fresh light on historical ant research and sets up future work investigating the origins and regulation of this putative mechanism.

PMID:
42604581
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement