Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

MobDedup: Mobile data deduplication for enhancing digital forensics.

Created on 17 Aug 2026

Authors

Priteshkumar Prajapati, Hiren Mewada, Parth Shah

Published in

Journal of forensic sciences. Aug 16, 2026. Epub Aug 16, 2026.

Abstract

Smartphones provide crucial but duplicate information in forensic investigations. The major deduplication tools designed for the cloud ignore constraints on phone storage, power, data fragmentation, and dynamic handling, leading to processing delays and limiting their efficient use. It also affects evidence integrity and increases the potential risk of data leakage. This paper proposes a data deduplication technique for resource-constrained Android devices with limited computing power and memory. The use of the Blake2b-Hash Algorithm in the proposed deduplication algorithm reduces overhead and enables dynamic memory allocation. Multiple strategies were proposed and tested using a wide range of Smartphones. The proposed algorithm is validated based on file analysis time, device storage and memory utilization, and storage overhead. The paper also assesses the hash function's cryptographic robustness. The experimental analysis demonstrates that the proposed method achieved a 45.90% processing time to identify 29.52% duplicate files. A 48.55% reduction in storage space was achieved, and battery consumption was reduced to 81.15% compared to MD5 and SHA224. It achieved up to 52.71% RAM optimization, along with only 0.0033% storage overhead to maintain the metadata of deleted files for forensic purposes. This proves the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed solutions in facilitating digital forensic analysis.

PMID:
42604860
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Aug 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 15
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement